Thursday, February 19, 2009

Funniest copyright license?

From a Debian bug report comes the copyright license for a file from a LaTeX package:

% This should appear in a file named diagram.tex
% Copyright 1988,1989 Michael Barr
[snip]
%
% All commercial rights reserved. May be freely distributed
% and used with the following exceptions:
% 1. No commercial use without explicit permission.
% 2. It may not be used by any employee of a telephone
% company.
% 3. It may not be distributed without this notice.


You have to wonder what the author had against telephone companies.

Labels: , , ,


Sunday, May 20, 2007

Should copyrights last forever?

Mark Helprin argues in a New York Times op-ed piece that “no good case exists for the inequality of real and intellectual property, because no good case can exist for treating with special disfavor the work of the spirit and the mind.”

Not surprisingly, Lawrence Lessig's community is drafting an op-ed piece in response. In true free-culture style, the response piece is being written by wiki (— and under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike copyright license).

Labels: , ,


Sunday, February 04, 2007

From the fact-is-just-a-few-months-behind-parody department

One of these links is to a satire.
The other is to a real news story.
Which is which?

Link 1.
Link 2.

(Note: There's somewhat contradictory information on the 'net about the resolution of the real issue. The main point here is that 55" or larger televisions will soon be common in normal households. And, that's where the satire becomes more plausible.)

Labels: , , , ,